Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP 6.0 Upgrade
Viewing all 4288 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: Severe error(s) occured in phase PREP_PRE_CHECK/PROFREAD

November 21, 2013, 4:08 am
$
0
0

hi Premush,

Please find.

1 ETQ201 Entering upgrade-phase "PREP_EXTRACT/BEGIN_PRE" ("20131121142045")

2 ETQ367 Connect variables are set for standard instance access

4 ETQ399 System-nr = '00', GwService = 'sapgw00' Client = '000'

4 ETQ399 Environment variables:

4 ETQ399   auth_shadow_upgrade=<null>

1 ETQ200 Executing actual phase 'PREP_EXTRACT/BEGIN_PRE'.

1 ETQ399 Phase arguments:

2 ETQ399 Arg[0] = 'INITCHECKS;MKDIRS;STARTTIME;CHECKPHASEOPTS=DBTYPE+OSTYPE;PROTECT_PARS=fastdatacopy,zerodowntime_upg'

4 ETQ399 Start time set as 20131121 142045.

4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20131121142046 

1 ETQ202 Upgrade phase "BEGIN_PRE" completed sucessfully ("20131121142046")

 

Regards,

↧
Search

Re: All the objects under with Modification Assistant are green still with Modification Assistant in blue colour?

November 21, 2013, 4:35 am
$
0
0

Rajesh,

Like I said before you need to expand all the sub trees and find the one which doesn't look proper.

I know it is a painful process to go through all those entries.

I suggest to take help from an ABAP'er to guide you.

 

Regards

RB

↧
↧

Re: Severe error(s) occured in phase PREP_PRE_CHECK/PROFREAD

November 21, 2013, 4:38 am
$
0
0

You may check the PROFREAD.LOG like I have suggested above.

 

Regards

RB

↧

Re: Severe error(s) occured in phase PREP_PRE_CHECK/PROFREAD

November 21, 2013, 5:06 am
$
0
0

Please attach PROFREAD.LOG file to thread.

↧

Re: Best practice for SUM tool version usage

November 22, 2013, 5:01 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

Please post the exact error..

 

Thanks

Rishi Abrol

↧
↧

Re: Severe error(s) occured in phase PREP_PRE_CHECK/PROFREAD

November 22, 2013, 8:43 pm
$
0
0

hi Premsukh,

sory for delay, please find required log.

 

1 ETQ201 Entering upgrade-phase "PREP_PRE_CHECK/PROFREAD" ("20131121142527")

2 ETQ367 Connect variables are set for standard instance access

4 ETQ399 System-nr = '00', GwService = 'sapgw00' Client = '000'

4 ETQ399 Environment variables:

4 ETQ399   auth_shadow_upgrade=<null>

1 ETQ200 Executing actual phase 'PREP_PRE_CHECK/PROFREAD'.

1 ETQ399 Phase arguments:

2 ETQ399 Arg[0] = ''

1 ETQ399 SAP service SAPSPT_00 is running on account LocalSystem

1 ETQ399 Please reconfigure the service by using a NT user account

1EETQ399 Last error code set is:

1EETQ204 Upgrade phase "PROFREAD" aborted with severe errors ("20131121142527")

 

 

regards,

↧

Re: Best practice for SUM tool version usage

November 22, 2013, 9:19 pm
$
0
0

the issue is not the error. we had some file permission issues cropping up but the point is once that is resolved and when you hit continue it should moved forward but it doesnt it starts extraction all files from beginning even the ones extracted.

↧

Re: Best practice for SUM tool version usage

November 22, 2013, 9:33 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

Might be that sum tools is trying to find a file and is missing that might be due to the permission issues. So usually try to reset the Sum tool and start again.

 

Is it in the phase of extracting files in the directory /eps/in. Please also check that you are not missing any files.

 

Please dont mix issue . if you still have issue open a new post with full details..

Thanks

Rishi Abrol

↧
Search

Re: Best practice for SUM tool version usage

November 22, 2013, 9:37 pm
$
0
0

Isssue is now resolved. you are not getting the point there are no missing files. only permission issue on files getting extraction in EPS/in and it gave error not owner we had to manually give permissions and when we conitnue it begins extraction again, so as everytime we got error the extraction would begin again which wasted a whole lot of time. this seems to be a bug to me.

↧
↧

Re: Best practice for SUM tool version usage

November 22, 2013, 9:58 pm
$
0
0

Yes Because are repeating the Phase after the error .Its not starting from the point of the phase where it failed. its repeating the whole phase.

 

If you dont want this error why cant you just not clear the old file as a per step and start the upgrade with correct permission.

 

This error is due to all the system use one shared drive so you can also use a separate drive during the upgrade purpose for eps/in.

 

Thanks

Rishi Abrol

↧

Hardware configuration requirement for EHP up gradation

November 23, 2013, 11:30 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We are using SAP EHP3 with mssql 2005 on windows 2008 server.

 

We are planing to upgrade my SAP to SAP EHP 6, i want to know what is the hardware configuration requirement for EHP6 upgrade.

And what is SAP recommended Hardware configuration for EHP 6 for DEV-QAS-PRD( my prd server cluster based)

 

Please reply asap..this is urgent requirement.

 

Thanks

↧

Re: Hardware configuration requirement for EHP up gradation

November 23, 2013, 11:56 pm
$
0
0

Hi Kote,

 

You can check the installation guide of SAP Netweaver SAP systems based on SAP Netweaver 7.0/ 7.01, 7.02, 7.03 for ABAP based systems

For Java based systems on NW 7.1 and higher guides.https://websmp106.sap-ag.de/%7Esapidb/011000358700001389072012E

Hardware and software requirements of Planning section will give you the details.

 

regards

kartik

↧

Re: Hardware configuration requirement for EHP up gradation

November 23, 2013, 11:58 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

First of all i would suggest you to go through the PAM and see that the current hardware and the DB version is supported on EHP6.

 

Please go through the below blog for more info has been discussed...

 

http://scn.sap.com/message/14517227

 

Thanks

Rishi Abrol

↧
↧

Re: Hardware configuration requirement for EHP up gradation

November 24, 2013, 12:03 am
↧

Re: Open entries in SPAU before upgrade start

November 26, 2013, 3:49 am
$
0
0

Understand SPDD / SPAU need to be tackled as part of the upgrade. But what to do with any remaining SPAU entries from former Support Pack projects? Do we need to clean them before we perform the upgrade?

Most of the times the development team takes care of the SPDD and SPAU tasks. Is this in your case as well ?

For the items that are in the Tx SPAU will require an object key to get them processed if they have been there for more than 14 days.

If you want to be 100% sure then I would get hold of an ABAP'er to cross check them.

I would check the status of the objects in SPAU with this:

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/ff/bc563cd365f646e10000000a11405a/content.htm

If as part of a former support pack project, a changed SAP Standard objects was delivered to which the customer had a modification and the SPAU was not cleansed, I assume the System would default back to using the new SAP Standard but not the modification? Can you confirm?

During an upgrade you have the previlege to retain the modifications you have made to the standard SAP objects using the Tx SPDD.

Hence if we perform the upgrade the system would just take over the SAP Standard?

An upgrade brings in new or optimized objects into the SAP system.

If you want to retain the modifications then you may need to do the SPDD on the system.

 

Regards

RB

↧
Search

EHP6: EHP_INCLUSION in module PREP_EXTENSION / Extension module

November 26, 2013, 4:03 am
$
0
0

Dear All,

I am facing below issue during EHP 6 upgradation. Extraction phase successfully completed but now stuck on below INCLUSION phase

SAPup_troubleticket.log

SAPup broke during phase EHP_INCLUSION in module PREP_EXTENSION / Extension module

Error Message: Unable to generate addon queue. Return Code = -99, Reason = "Add on installation/upgrade not yet complete.

CRTs are required", check log file 'SPDA_EHP_INCLUSION.LOG' for details

If you put new packages in the download directory, use option 'init' to upload them

Summary of SAPup:

-------------------------------------------------------------

SAPehpi Release:          lmt_005

SAPehpi Version:          SAPup release lmt_005 version 54.000

Start Release:                    700

Target Release:                    731

 

 

SPDA_EHP_INCLUSION.LOG

2 ETN085X"Calculate pure CRT Queue" "for installed Add-ons" "and already applied Support Packages" " "

3 ETN112 The OCS Package Queue is empty

2 ETN085X"Adding Add-on Installation Queue" " " " " " "

2EETN403 Add on installation/upgrade not yet complete. CRTs are required (which CRT and Add-On while I already download stack after successfully synch my test system(PRDSPT) from LMDB)

1 ETN214X."**************************************************"

1 ETN251   End of phase: "'Add-on Queue Calculation'"

1 ETN254       End date: "26.11.2013"

1 ETN255       End time: "15:44:11"

1 ETN214 ."**************************************************"

 

Please find attachments for complete log.

 

Regards,

↧

Re: EHP6: EHP_INCLUSION in module PREP_EXTENSION / Extension module

November 26, 2013, 4:32 am
$
0
0

It appears to me that the ST-PI files are missing.

Can you check whether the ST-PI files are present ?

 

Regards

RB

↧
↧

Re: EHP6: EHP_INCLUSION in module PREP_EXTENSION / Extension module

November 26, 2013, 4:39 am
$
0
0

Hello Jamil,

 

The issue seems to be related to the error  " Add on installation/upgrade not yet complete. CRTs are required" . 

 

Refer to the SAP Note  1037374 - CRTs for CPRXRPM 400 for the resolution.

 

Check this thread too: https://scn.sap.com/thread/1179905

 

 

Regards,

Mudasir.

↧

Re: EHP6: EHP_INCLUSION in module PREP_EXTENSION / Extension module

November 26, 2013, 4:54 am
$
0
0

Hi,

I don't see any line in the logs that it says that about the conflict.

 

Only below lines.

 

2WETQ399 File 'G:/usr/sap/trans/EPS/in\51039102_13.ZIP' size 21598kB could not be recognized!

2WETQ399 File 'G:/usr/sap/trans/EPS/in\CID0020068250_0028879.PAT' size 21kB could not be recognized!

2WETQ399 File 'G:/usr/sap/trans/EPS/in\CID0020068250_0028881.PAT' size 19kB could not be recognized!

2WETQ399 File 'G:/usr/sap/trans/EPS/in\CID0020068250_0028882.PAT' size 19kB could not be recognized!

2WETQ399 File 'G:/usr/sap/trans/EPS/in\CID0020068250_0028884.PAT' size 19kB could not be recognized!

2WETQ399 File 'G:/usr/sap/trans/EPS/in\CID0020068250_0028885.PAT' size 19kB could not be recognized!

2WETQ399 File 'G:/usr/sap/trans/EPS/in\CID0020068250_0028890.PAT' size 26kB could not be recognized!

2WETQ399 File 'G:/usr/sap/trans/EPS/in\CID0020068250_0028891.PAT' size 28kB could not be recognized!

 

So would suggest just reset the tool delete all the files from the ERP/In and restart the tools.

 

Because if there is any miss match it should say like this.

 

Installation Package for add-on <(>&<)>1 rel.<(>&<)>2 does not exist

 

Thanks

Rishi Abrol

↧

Re: EHP6: EHP_INCLUSION in module PREP_EXTENSION / Extension module

November 26, 2013, 6:07 am
$
0
0

hi Rishi,

Right now, I am using SUM10SP09_0-20006676.SAR. Is it Ok or I have to try with SUM8.

I already downloaded the stack now which CRTs are required

anyways.. I did reset the sum and doing again.

 

 

Regards,

↧
Viewing all 4288 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>