Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP 6.0 Upgrade
Browsing all 4288 articles
Browse latest View live

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

We are in the switching phase ... The KERNEL right now is 721 and after switching in EXECUTION PHASE of SUM will be 741.  in KERNEL 740 and above Shared memory 40 and 10 are not required.  at the...

View Article


Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

Hi Zubair,ERROR => NiPConnect2: SiPeekPendConn failed for hdl 38/sock 13    (SI_ECONN_REFUSE/111; I4; ST; 10.1.25.110:3900) [nixxi.cpp    3286]*** ERROR => MsIAttachEx: NiBufConnect to...

View Article


Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

You could also refer SCN thread at Very Very Urgent : Error during MAIN_UPTRANS/ST... | SCN Regards,Gaurav

View Article

Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

SAME error after inserting parameter to Instance.

View Article

Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

No Luck yet

View Article


Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

Problems EHP4 in HA environment HP-UX / Oracle 11.2.0.2http://scn.sap.com/thread/1952597  Helpful thread...we are going through this .. lets see

View Article

Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

Its more related to High Availability problem with SUM.. the log is as given from instance.out:We have high availability configured for Production server but we are not using additional server for high...

View Article

Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

Hi Zubair, As per me mentioned SCN thread by you is not relevant here.http://scn.sap.com/thread/1952597KERNEL 740 and above  Could you share dev_disp.new trace file & refer SAP KBA 1932555 -...

View Article


Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

At last successfully done with EHP7 Upgrade ............  Will soon update resolution to problem faced in details. Thanks for all support.

View Article


Re: Upgrade SAP 4.7 to 6.0

Hi Aher  Could you share you OS /DB version details? I think you require to upgrade the OS / DB based on your version. Could you refer the SAP PAM for ECC 6.0 OS / DB requirement...

View Article

Re: Severe error(s) occured in phase MAIN_INIT/UCMIG_STATUS_CHK!

We too had a similar issue during upgrade where it complained that the pre-conversion steps were  not completed but in SPUMG all tables were green. We ran the function module to set the status to 1 and...

View Article

2EETW169 no connect possible: "maybe someone set invalid values for DIR_LIBRARY

Hi All, We are getting below error during execution phase. Kindly help me on it.I have checked all the environments and all looks fine. Regards,Karthik.R

View Article

Re: 2EETW169 no connect possible: "maybe someone set invalid values for...

Hi Karthik, please execute the statement "R3trans -x" from OS level and attach the file "trans.log". This will be generated in the directory from which you execute the statement. Best regards,Andreas

View Article


Re: 2EETW169 no connect possible: "maybe someone set invalid values for...

Hi Andreas, If i try to execute manually. I can do it . This is R3trans version 6.25 (release 742 - 11.02.15 - 14:06:42).unicode enabled versionR3trans finished (0000).

View Article

Re: 2EETW169 no connect possible: "maybe someone set invalid values for...

Hi Kartik , The attachment is missing in your post . Please post your error message  once again Thanks ,Manu

View Article


Re: 2EETW169 no connect possible: "maybe someone set invalid values for...

Did you use the R3trans from the same folder as that one which has been used as the error message appeared?

View Article

Re: 2EETW169 no connect possible: "maybe someone set invalid values for...

If you are in the middle of an upgrade check the logs in the upgrade directory. if the database is Oracle make sure you are using the 11G Oracle Instant Client software and the environment variables...

View Article


Re: 2EETW169 no connect possible: "maybe someone set invalid values for...

HI All, The issue is solved after running sapcpe=<intanceprofile>.Thanks for all ur inputs. Regards,Karthik.R

View Article

Re: MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative !

Hello Zubair,   we're glad the issues were resolved. As mentioned on the incident, it seems the errors observed on the profile handling phases caused all of this headache.  Please share the solution...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Re: XPRA ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPR-60601INFICA.ERS

This answer solves my problem during upgrade to EHP7, thanks a lot

View Article
Browsing all 4288 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>